Strategic & Cognitive Dimensions You've developed a compelling 3-year strategy for your division. Your team was energized by the vision presentation last quarter. But when you review the current budget and project portfolio, 80% of resources are still allocated to last year's priorities. Nothing has actually changed. What is your best next move* Select an option... Re-present the vision with more urgency. The team needs to hear it again with clearer messaging. Identify 2-3 concrete initiatives that directly support the new strategy, allocate specific resources and owners, set milestones, and publicly communicate what you're deprioritizing from the old plan to make room. Ask each direct report to submit a plan for how their team will contribute to the new strategy by end of quarter. Accept that strategy takes time to cascade. Keep the vision alive and let the shift happen organically over the next 12-18 months.
You notice three seemingly unrelated developments in the same month: a major competitor launches a subscription model, a new regulation in an adjacent industry increases compliance costs for shared vendors, and your best customer mentions they're being pressured by their board to reduce vendor count by 30%. What do you do* Select an option... Monitor the situation. These are separate issues and you don't want to overreact to coincidental timing. Map the three developments together: explore whether the subscription model signals a shift in your industry, whether the regulation will affect your cost structure through shared vendors, and whether your customer's vendor consolidation creates an opportunity or risk. Present your analysis to your leadership team with scenarios. Focus on the customer risk — vendor consolidation is the most immediate threat. Start building a retention plan for that account. Research whether the subscription model is working for the competitor and brief your product team.
Which concern keeps you up at night more* Select an option... "A competitor will launch a better product or service and take our market share." "Something we're not even thinking about — a new technology, regulation, or business model — will make what we do irrelevant."
Which statement better reflects your approach* Select an option... "My primary job is to deliver on this year's commitments. If I do that well, the future takes care of itself." "My primary job is to position my team to thrive in 3-5 years. That means sometimes sacrificing short-term comfort for long-term capability."
"I have explicitly defined the tradeoffs I'm willing to make between short-term performance and long-term investment — and my team understands these tradeoffs."*
1 2 3 4 5
Describe the last time you made a decision that sacrificed short-term results or comfort for a longer-term strategic gain. What was the situation, what did you decide, and what happened*
Your Director of Product proposes launching a new service line targeting an adjacent market segment. The projected revenue is compelling, but it would require 15% of your team's capacity for 6 months. If it fails, you'd have burned resources and potentially strained relationships with existing clients. What is your best course of action* Select an option... Approve the full launch — without risk there's no reward, and the numbers look strong. Decline — the risk to your core business and team capacity isn't worth an unproven market bet. Propose a 6-week sprint to test the concept with 5% of team capacity: build a minimal offer, approach 10 prospects, and define clear go/no-go metrics before committing further. Commission a full market research study before making any resource commitments.
Your organization launches an annual "Innovation Week" where teams pitch bold new ideas. It generates excitement and promising proposals. But reviewing the last three years, none of the winning pitches have been implemented — they all stalled due to competing priorities. What is your assessment and response* Select an option... The event is still valuable for team morale and creative thinking. Not every idea needs to be implemented. Cancel the event — if ideas aren't getting implemented, it's just performative innovation. Keep the event but add a mandatory implementation track: every winning pitch gets a 90-day execution plan, a budget allocation, and a designated owner. Only ideas with committed resources can win. Survey the teams to understand why implementations are failing before making changes.
Which statement better reflects your approach when facing a stubborn problem* Select an option... "I gather more information and analyze the problem more deeply until the solution becomes clear." "I look for analogies from completely different contexts — other industries, nature, history — to find a pattern I can apply."
When was the last time you meaningfully changed your mind about something important in your work* Select an option... "Within the last 3 months — I encountered new information or a better argument and adjusted my position." "I can't recall a specific instance — my core approach is well-established and has served me well."
"People on my team feel safe proposing ideas that might not work, even when budgets or deadlines are tight."*
1 2 3 4 5
Describe a time when you had to learn something completely new to solve a problem or seize an opportunity. What was the situation, how did you approach the learning, and what was the outcome*
A $2.3 million digital transformation project is 60% over budget. The project sponsor wants a Phase 2 reboot, arguing "we've come too far to stop now." What is your response* Select an option... Agree — we've invested too much to walk away. Approve Phase 2 with tighter controls. Reframe the decision: if we had $1.5 million to invest today with no prior investment, would we choose this project? Evaluate Phase 2 on its standalone merits independent of sunk costs. Request a detailed audit of what went wrong in Phase 1 before making any decision about Phase 2. Kill the project entirely — the cost overrun is evidence the approach is fundamentally flawed.
A critical supplier announces a 40% price increase effective in 30 days. You have three options: absorb the cost and protect margins elsewhere, switch suppliers with 6-week transition risk, or renegotiate with the current supplier under time pressure. How do you decide* Select an option... Make the call yourself quickly based on your experience — you know these suppliers and the market. Gather your operations and finance leads, frame the three options with risk/reward analysis, set a 48-hour decision deadline, and use a structured evaluation matrix to reach consensus. Delegate the analysis to your procurement team and ask for a recommendation by end of week. Call the supplier immediately and negotiate aggressively — you don't have time for analysis.
When evaluating a proposal, which matters more to you* Select an option... "The strength of the evidence and the quality of the pro/con analysis, regardless of who's presenting." "The credibility and track record of the people presenting the proposal."
After making an unpopular decision, which is your priority* Select an option... "Ensure everyone understands the reasoning behind the decision, even if they disagree with it." "Work to bring people into alignment with the decision so we can move forward together."
"I can clearly distinguish between decisions that are reversible (where speed matters) and decisions that are irreversible (where accuracy matters) — and I calibrate my approach accordingly."*
1 2 3 4 5
Describe a significant decision you made with incomplete or ambiguous information. How did you decompose the problem, evaluate the evidence, and what was the outcome*